Jellytown

Haircuts

2008-10-01T20:34:00.001-04:00

I don't pay a lot for haircuts. It's one of the perks of being a guy. I don't have to schedule them, I don't have to pay a lot. I'm probably never more than half an hour away from a Great Clips. I have a lot of haircut freedom. It's nice.

Recently my girlfriend tried to convince me that at least once in my life I should pay a fair amount of money and get a NICE haircut. Wouldn't I like to have someone shampoo my hair, and rub my scalp and pay attention to me for a long time? No, that sounds horrible. I want my simple, cheap haircut.

I don't know what I would be paying for if I got a more expensive haircut, because I like my hair fine after I get my haircuts now. What I want most from any given haircut is for my hair to be shorter than it was, and to not look like some kind of freak. Very simple expectations.

It's also very hard to quantify what a "bad haircut" looks like. Barring complete lopsidedness, or a missing patch it's hard to distinguish a bad haircut from a haircut that someone doesn't like.

That's why I can't believe that I rarely leave a haircut with my sideburns anywhere close to straight. It's one of the very few things that a haircutter can absolutely do wrong. There's no way that I somehow failed to communicate my desire for straight, even sideburns. And it's not like they even try, and fail. Often times they're slanted in different directions.

And it's not a huge deal, because it's something I just fix myself after every visit. I go home, take the clippers out, buzz buzz, and then take a shower to make sure to get rid of all of the little hairs that end up in your collar and make you itch all day.

In closing, if there is something in your line of work that distinguishes between crappy and average, and that thing is really easy to do, then you should probably do it. Because $12 isn't too little to pay to get matching freaking sideburns.

JELLY TOWN!!!

2008-09-25T23:29:00.001-04:00

Attempt! And videotape! Please!

2007-03-22T20:33:00.000-04:00

The whole "Do not attempt" line at the bottom of certain commercials is pretty well-worn territory. A litigation-crazy society has caused advertisers to be overly cautious with their warnings, and so there are a lot of commercials with ridiculous things going on, and at the bottom of the screen, there is a caution to not try and attempt whatever is going on.

I'm not the first person to notice this. Commercials undergo a great deal of scrutiny. People gather socially to watch TV, and commercials can provide awkward in that experience. People feel like they have to say something, and often the easiest thing to talk about are the various stupidities of whatever commercial is on.

But I just saw a commercial for some antiperspirant, and yeah, it was amazing. The premise is that this guy is in Pamplona for the running of the bulls, but instead of bulls, he gets chased through the narrow streets of Pamplona by bears, wolves, and rhinos. And at the bottom of the screen, as CGIed bears snap their teeth at his shoelaces, we're firmly told, "Do not attempt."

Well, I disagree. I say, attempt. If you have the wherewithal to stage a running of the bulls with bears, wolves, and rhinos, I think you have an obligation to do so. That would be pretty darn impressive.

And the last thing anyone would care about was whether or not your antiperspirant was working.

Now With Even Funnier Stories About Food!

2007-01-14T20:52:00.000-05:00

I really like Hamburger Helper. It allows me to have some sense of involvement in the meal that i will then eat, but it is also really quick and easy. I get to feel like i did some cooking, without any real effort or cooking skill. It does require certain cooking utensils, but those were easy to acquire.

My favorite dish is actually "Chicken Helper", but it's obviously under the same Hamburger Helper umbrella. It still has the same little anthropomorphized glove on the box. Right now, I'm making legitimate, old-school Hamburger Helper. The actual hamburger-based helpers amuse me, because it's all basically the same thing with slightly different names and flavors. It's basically all macaroni-and-cheese with hamburger meat. But the noodles are basically all the same, it's just a different powder every time. And a slightly different name. Today, it's "Beef Pasta."

Lots of products use the "New and improved strategy."
-"Now with twice as many raisins"
-"Now with an even bigger crunch!"
-"New, longer-lasting!"

But this box of Hamburger Helper has my favorite one ever:

"Now Better Tasting!"

As if to say, "If you enjoyed the crappy old Beef Pasta, you'll LOVE the Beef Pasta that actually tastes sorta OK."

"And you'll get to feel like you cooked something, when really, your skillset is basically limited to browning ground beef."

Bye Bye Birdie

2006-10-27T16:57:00.000-04:00

I was watching a crappy policey type movie the other day and there was an exchange of dialogue that went something like this:

Dumb cop: "My gut tells me this was just a robbery that went bad and ended up getting this guy killed."

Kiefer Sutherland: "You know why I don't go with my gut? Because once you let your gut make up your mind about something, you're only gonna see the evidence that supports your gut. This was no robbery. It was... an assassination."

(Kiefer ended up being right!)

For a long time now, I've been making the same mistake as that dumb cop. When I was little I decided that the Blue jay was my favorite bird. That decision made sense: they're pretty cool looking, they're not too small, they're cool enough that they get chosen as the mascot for sports teams, and most importantly they're easy to identify. If I had said that the house wren was my favorite bird, I would have set myself up for some embarrassment:

"Hey look, my favorite bird! The House Wren!"

"Um, that's actually the Carolina Wren. I think you'll notice the subtly different markings on its back and wings. Unless of course, you're not even that familiar with the house wren... but that's impossible, because you just told me it was your favorite bird."

"Totally."

So I think I was justified in choosing the Blue jay as my favorite bird. But since then, I've learned a thing or two about birds (although not as much as the hypothetical bird expert I was hanging out with above). And what I've learned is that the Blue jay is basically the hugest jackass of the bird kingdom. They're loud and they just fly around and harass other birds. They're like the entertainment news reporters of the animal kingdom.

And I learned these things about the Blue jay, but I ignored them, because it was my favorite bird.

But people, that was wrong. It's as wrong as trying to say that something was a botched robbery when there are apparently assassination clues all over the place.

And so maybe it's time for all of us to rethink some of our preconceptions and make sure that we're not keeping ourself blind to the information/assassination clues that are all around us.

And I'm gonna pick a new favorite bird.

Anyone want some free milk?

2006-10-04T01:23:00.000-04:00

I have some free time.

One thing that I'd like to do is to purchase a cow. I'd also like to purchase the equipment required for pasteurizing and homogenizing milk. Then I would take some time to learn how to milk a cow, and how to use that equipment to make delicious drinkable milk.

After doing that, I would like to find someone who likes milk, someone who drinks milk every day. And I would like to enter into a longstanding agreement with them whereby every day I would give them fresh, delicious milk for free. I would make it clear that nothing was expected in return, that I merely wanted to give them free milk every day from my cow.

Then after several months or even a couple of years pass by, I would offer to sell them the cow. I would offer to sell the cow at a reasonable price, but I would make sure that the person knew that this was the same cow from which that person had received free milk all of that time. And I would make sure that they knew that if they didn't buy the cow, they would still receive the milk for free.

I'd be interested to see what they'd do.

Question: Is an analogy really valid if the comparable situation has never really existed? Like, I'm sure at some point someone actually counted their eggs before they were hatched. Is anyone else asking these sorts of questions?

Maybe I have too much free time. But I have an inkling that there's at least a chance that my free-milk-receiver will buy my cow.

Post-enlightenment? Post-shmenlightenment!

2006-09-22T15:26:00.000-04:00

Things that have me convinced that I'm not an entirely rational human being:

1. I'm convinced that if i am in an emotional state of anger, frustration or stress, I somehow attract cars with idiots driving around them. I am convinced of this despite the obvious explanation that in these times of stress I am more likely to notice/be irritated by other drivers. Also, I am more likely to be in a hurry to get somewhere, and thus more able to be inconvenienced by the actions of other drivers. Nonetheless, I refuse to believe that these facts fully explain my magical ability to attract bad drivers in certain emotional states.

2. I live in an apartment by myself. I moved in basically by myself. Everything in my apartment is where it is because I put it there. In the case of my kitchen, I actually took time to think through what would be the most logical/efficient places for things to go. All of that being said, every time I go to get a glass, I have a 50% chance of opening the wrong cupboard (and there are only 2 choices).

3. About a month ago, I was convinced for several days that a person could see one's reflection in a screened door. Not, it is important to note, that I could see my reflection in some glass behind the screen. No, I was convinced that the mesh of thin metal wire was somehow reflective in a way that a person could see a fairly clear reflection of oneself.

4. In my early teens, after a particularly vivid dream, I became convinced that if I jumped off my parents' bed and flapped my arms, I could fly.

"Internet Fight!" (as shouted by middle schoolers in an online cafeteria)

2006-09-04T00:37:00.000-04:00

My friend Chris (not Christ) has alerted me to the fact that I am the #1 google search for Jellytown. What can I say! That's pretty encouraging. What with all of the people searching for jellytown...

However, when i searched for jellytown in google, I was disturbed to find out that the the #2 search result was this mook:
Apparently this guy has the Yahoo! profile name "Jellytown." That, of course, is ridiculous. This man is not a town. He is a person. And he's ridiculous. Under "occupation" he wrote: bald person.

Seriously?

Under Marital Status? No answer. What did you think it was? Some kind of trick question? Is it that hard? Do you have some kind of weird commitment issues?

Perhaps so, because under location? Maryland/Scotland

What? You can't even decide where you are!?!

This guy is lame and he's trying to horn in on my position as mayor of Jellytown. I did not name myself mayor of Jellytown so that I could legislate this dude.

So as of right now I'm throwing down the gauntlet, slapping him in the face with my gloves, and performing any other handwear-based fight instigations that may exist. Next time you're in Maryland and not Scotland, drive down to the real Jellytown (pop: me) and claim the beating that you're owed.

And people? Let's work hard to make sure the REAL Jellytown stays on top. Of google searches. For the exact name of my blog. Seriously, it would be embarrasing if it wasn't.

A lame excuse to compare myself with God? Or vice versa?

2006-09-02T20:07:00.000-04:00

"God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in times of trouble." - Psalm 46

"Meanwhile, where is God? This is one of the most disquieting symptoms. When you are happy, so happy that you have no sense of needing Him, so happy that you are tempted to feel His claims upon you as an interruption, if you remember yourself and turn to Him with gratitude and praise, you will be--or so it feels--welcomed with open arms. But go to Him when your need is desperate, when all other help is vain, and what do you find? A door slammed in your face, and a sound of bolting and double bolting on the inside. After that, silence. You may as well turn away. The longer you wait, the more emphatic the silence will become. There are no lights in the windows. It might be an empty house. Was it ever inhabited? It seemed so once. And that seeming was as strong as this. What can this mean? Why is He so present a commander in our time of prosperity and so very absent a help in time of trouble." - C.S. Lewis, A Grief Observed

--------------------------

Well, which is it? We certainly expect God to be our comfort in times of suffering. If religion is really the opiate of the masses, aren't our times of suffering the moments when it should really kick in? Why can't we click up the doses of spiritual comfort like morphine?

Why is it my own experiences (and those of so many with whom I've spoken) mirror Lewis' account of God's presence in times of trouble?

Maybe it's because we don't know what real suffering is. I'm rich and white and smart and PRIVILEGED in almost every sense of the word. Lewis falls in those categories. Unfortunately, so do the vast majority of individuals with whom I spend my time. Maybe we just don't have a handle on what suffering really is. Maybe our sickness, our frustration, our fear, our pain doesn't add up enough in the grand scheme of things to really count as suffering or distress. Maybe God doesn't comfort us because we don't really need him yet.

But that doesn't ring true. Pain is still pain. And Christianity teaches that God loves each and every one of us.

-------------------------

Recently I've had the same frustrating feeling replayed in numerous situations. I don't consider it boasting to say that I'm funny and fun and I have a gift for making people smile and laugh. At times I've wondered if there is an unselfish purpose for spending so much of my time in a comedy theater working on becoming better at a comedic artform. And the consolation I arrive at (and I still don't have myself 100% convinced of its verity) is that it is a good thing for people to be entertained. If I wanted to construct it in lamely noble terms, I'd say something like, "It's a tough world out there, at least for a little while, I made someone smile." (If the world's so tough, why don't I go out and feed someone instead? Or clothe them? Can you see why i'm not 100% convinced it's not all just selfishness?)

And all I can really do is make people who feel alright feel even better. I can amuse and even distract, but I can't heal. I can't solve things. And that's been my frustration lately - that I've been around people in real pain and each time I am rendered completely impotent. All of my jokes and wit get exposed for the merely silly things they are. They may make life a little easier and a little more enjoyable, but they can't really help anything. And without my meaningless words, I'm speechless.

And so I can't help but imagine my friends in pain not thinking something along the lines of Lewis' words - "When I was feeling fine, I couldn't get you to shut up. If I laugh it only encourages you more. But right now when I truly need someone all you can do is sit there, or lamely touch my hand, or squint and say something obvious and unhelpful like 'I'm so sorry." Where are you now that I need you?"

-----------------------------

Does God sometimes feel like I've been feeling? It seems like a really stupid thing to say and I feel like there are a thousand "Bad Theology" alarms ringing off in my head. But I've always thought that good theology consisted largely of asking questions, and so I'll soldier on. For any readers who don't believe in God, and have kept reading in the hopes that there's a punchline in here somewhere, now might be a time to jump ship on this particular post. At least, I don't see the comedy coming yet. And I'm sorry I've dragged you along this far, but I did start out with a quote from the Bible. Feel free to come back later when I eat some more moldy bread.

But certainly for whatever reason (the need for free will? an ability to see the grander plan?), God has seen fit to limit His own involvement in some ways - to constrain His own omnipotence. So without denying the possibility of miracles or the simple truth that many have felt deeply comforted and consoled by God in their hours of deepest pain and need, it seems quite possible to me that there are moments where God is rendered speechless. Perhaps moments when God feels impotent.

Maybe as my title suggests, this is just a lame attempt in a frustrating time to identify myself with God. Maybe it is just a result of my desire to fly in the face of more conservative theologies. Or maybe it's the almost universal fun that's had when things are shown to be the opposite of the way they are. (She's teasing you because she actually likes you! An omnipotent God sometimes renders Himself impotent!)

-------------------------

The quote I borrowed from C.S. Lewis comes from A Grief Observed - an amazing little book in which he chronicles his feelings during the days immediately following the death of his wife. It's insightful in ways that I can't imagine anyone could be at that time, but more than anything it is raw and honest and vulnerable. It's C.S Lewis, perhaps the most beloved and trusted practical theologian of the 20th century, and he is absolutely shaken. He has incredible doubts about God - "The conclusion I dread is not 'So there's no God after all,' but 'So this is what God's really like. Deceive yourself no longer.'" And yet he remains so faithful through it all. I don't know that I can go so far as to say that this is what faith should look like, but I think it's fair to say that it is what faith must look like. It's inevitable that at times our faith will be battered and beaten.

Towards the end of the book, Lewis rethinks the comments I quoted above:
"You can't, in most things, get what you want if you want it too desperately: anyway you can't get the best out of it... 'Now! Let's have a real good talk' reduces everyone to silence...
And so, perhaps, with God. I have gradually been coming to feel that the door is no longer shut and bolted. Was it my own frantic need that slammed it in my face? The time when there is nothing at all in your soul except a cry for help may be just the time when God can't give it: you are like the drowning man who can't be helped because he clutches and grabs. Perhaps your own reiterated cries deafen you to the voice you hoped to hear."

So perhaps in those times besides hurting friends, there is truly nothing I can do. Not through any fault of theirs or mine, but through the simple reality of the situation.

Throughout this piece, I've been struggling with an issue of word choice. I keep wanting to say that I'm helpless in the face of the suffering of others. That seems like the traditional turn of phrase. But what I feel, and don't want to say, is that I feel unhelpful. It is my friend, not I, who is helpless. I'm only helplessly unhelpful.

And in the end, what I may have to realize is that I'm not God. I can't fix everything. I can do very little. And I hate that, but I'm going to have to learn to live with it.

We have recommendations for you! (If you're not Bret Runestad, click here.)

2006-08-28T13:36:00.000-04:00

My friend Porter once remarked to me that he thought Amazon.com knew him better than any of his friends. I think this was largely based on the fact that Amazon.com actually knew when his birthday was. But the website also knew his favorite music, the kind of books that he liked to read, his taste in movies, etc.

The "recommendation" feature on commercial websites makes obvious sense. Based on your prior purchases, companies can market products in a very personalized manner. That way, when the new Old 97's CD comes out, they know exactly who to call. Porter. Or me. Their music provides the soundtrack of our friendship.

But sites like Amazon.com aren't my best friends. They're more like friends of my friends that I met at a party one time. And maybe I was really funny that night and I left a strong impression, so when I see them later on, they remember me for the things that I was talking about that night.

But maybe on that particular night, I had gone to a Coldplay concert the night before. And it was pretty fantastic. And so maybe it really dominated my conversation for that particular night.

But then every time I see my friend's friend after that, she makes all sorts of assumptions about the things I'd like to talk about.

"So I was checking out Guy Berryman's blog the other day, because I knew I'd be seeing you."

"Uh, ok..."

"And apparently, he's a big collector of vintage instruments (which I probably don't have to tell you), and he's like some big nerd about old-timey electronic gadgets and stuff."

"Yeah, sure."

"And then I was at the message boards over on inmyplace.net, and I was trying to guess what your handle was on the message boards there. I was guessing that you are either MartinFan11 or FixU924."

"Ok, it's just that I'm not sure what you're talking about right now."

"Coldplay! Your... favorite band ever. The only thing you ever talk about."

"No. I think you've misunderstood. I'm... a person. I like lots of things."

"Oh, I'm sorry. I understand. Well, if you like Coldplay, you must also like Keane. We can talk about them too."

So now whenever I go to Amazon, I get treated as though I absolutely LOVE all of these weird things. Because Amazon doesn't just sell music, movies and books. But they apply the same recommendation principles to all of their products.

"Hey Bret! You're just in time! We've got a TON of shaving gel in stock, and right now if you purchase 4, you'll get the 5th one free! And based on your past purchases (1 spatula), you may be interested in our brand new Spatula store - with over 30 brands of available spatulas.

And none of this is to suggest that I don't love Amazon.com. I do. It allows me to purchase a spatula with little to no human interaction. In fact, I was reminded of this weird internet phenomenon not because of Amazon.com, but because I recently had some flowers sent to my girlfriend through 1800flowers.com.

And ever since, I've been getting emails advertising their various flower specials. As if the typical flower-buying customer doesn't buy flowers for specific events or situations, but rather because he was able to get a great deal on an Orange and Yellow Lily Bouquet. At 15 lilies for $39.99, occasions for buying flowers create themselves!

Maybe I should start creating arguments with my girlfriend because I have to justify why there are going to be a stunning gathering of creamy, pink-hued celosia, pale pink hyacinths and stunning ‘Aqua’ roses, woven together in an intricate posy shape arriving in a classic square frosted vase the next morning at her doorstep.

Or maybe I'm just a guy who bought flowers online one time because I was out of town for my girlfriend's birthday. And maybe it's pretty likely that I never buy flowers online again. And maybe, if you knew me well enough to feel like you can tell which flowers I might like, then you should at least know that.

What Would Rommel Do?

2006-07-28T14:00:00.000-04:00

As someone with a degree in theology, I have a lot of Jesusy books. Most of them are very good, but some of them are quite bad.

A very popular form of Christian Literature is the devotional - books that often provide a text of Scripture and/or some piece of Jesusy wisdom in short snippets that are easy to digest. I have a daily devotional of passages from C.S. Lewis that I absolutely love (and that has also given me a near encylopedic knowledge of much of his more popular work). But I dislike the majority of them. The arbitrarily snipped out Bible verses are a particular peeve of mine, since it runs against the way I think the Bible should be read. But the vast majority of them are not comically bad enough that I would write something about them.

Enter God's Little Devotional Book (for Men)

I received this book a while back as a gift. I'm sure that whoever gave it to me only had the best intentions. But it is not a good book.

First of all, what a horrible title. As if this is the devotional book that God reads every morning. Or maybe since this is God's little devotional book, this is the book that he reads when he's on vacation and didn't want to pack the larger text. God likes to travel light. If at all possible, He always tries to avoid checking any baggage. But He's also careful to respect the other passengers and not try to cram too much into the overhead compartment.

My second problem with the title is that too much of Christian life gets divided into gender categories. I feel like the Church often still operates as if it's Middle School Health Class and we're discussing reproduction. Practically every Bible Study I was ever in during college was a Men's Bible Study. That had a lot of faults. It really narrowed the concerns that we had, and we spent most of the time discussing women and when we would get married, and how to control our out-of-control lustiness. For a culture that places so much emphasis on finding the right person and getting married and having kids and the perfect family, I don't see how it's very helpful to keep both sides of the gender line apart so that they can stew in their own anxieties. Or maybe that's the only way to keep from having a weird Jesusy orgy break out.

This devotional for men also puts a great deal of stress on how to be Jesusy and succeed in the world of business (two things that I don't see as particularly linked and should probably more than often be in opposition). So I shudder at the idea of what the devotional book for women might contain. Although come to think of it, I can get angry at the male gender bias as well. Screw you. Maybe Jesus wants me to be a stay-at-home Dad. I think I could do a lot worse.

Anyways, the jaw-dropping hallmark of this particular book cements my unwillingness to take anything it says seriously. (And I don't mind quoting from it without permission, as it is truly horrible).

On one page there is a pithy statement and a Bible quote:

Motivation is when your dreams put on work clothes.

"Whatever you do, work at it with all your heart, as working for the Lord, not for men." Colossians 3:23 NIV

And then on the ensuing page it recounts the following:

His teachers considered him to be a lazy student. One said he was convinced he would never amount to anything. Another said, "If Rommel ever hands in a dictation without a mistake we'll hire a band and go off for a day in the country."
That was all the incentive young Rommel needed. He immediately sat up, paid attention, and turned in a dictation without one single error. He obviously could do the work if he wanted to and if there was sufficient enticement to get him to make the effort! When the promised award was not forthcoming, however, Rommel fell back into his old ways.
Later in life Rommel did find a cause he could believe in. It fired his ambition to the extent that he was filled with driving energy, rose above the ranks, and eventually gained a reputation as one of the ablest military men in the world. Marshal Rommel became known as the "Desert Fox", one of Germany's foremost heroes in World War II.
Each person is motivated differently. For most people, the deepest motivation lies in their faith. However, the outcome of motivation is universal: It sparks the actions which will change your dreams into reality.

So...

This particular devotion starts with a quote from Colossians. And frankly, it's probably not the best quote to just yank out of context, because it's a part of one of the "Household Rules" texts - "wives, obey your husbands" and what-not. Considering the patriarchal society in which the Bible was written, this is precisely the sort of text that I think one should only draw from with the utomost care. This is a particular area where it seems that Scripture's guidance should be taken with more than just one grain of salt. I don't think that these texts are without significance, but I do think that they should come with labels saying "Handle with Extreme Care."

This particular quote comes from a handful of verses specifically directed to slaves or servants (the word in Greek can mean either). So, yeah, another sign that this shouldn't be presented to the modern reader without a great deal of context and interpretation.

And then what does this book do with that quote?

Well, first there's an insinuation that it's cool to only really be motivated by people harshing on you. What matters is that you were motivated. And then of course Rommel finds an even better cause (The Nazi Party and Hitler's desire to rule the world and cleanse it of everyone who doesn't look like him) and, yay, he's motivated. And you know what, he's motivated so much that he becomes one of Hitler's top generals! Hurray! So remember that each person is motivated differently, but apparently motivation is some Good in its own right, because at least it means that you're getting something done. So make sure that you're motivated, because only then can your dreams become a reality. Especially if your dream is to kill lots and lots of people.

(sigh)

Apparently, God should find a different devotional.

Pool Fool

2006-07-21T14:10:00.000-04:00

In an attempt to make myself slightly more attractive I sometimes head out to my apartment complex's swimming pool. I always do this during the day on weekdays because A) it's no fun hanging out by the pool by yourself in the dark (and it's against pool regulations) and B) it's a lot less crowded than on the weekends.

I don't have a lot of issues about my own body, so it's not that I mind there being other people around to enjoy my comically lanky physique. Instead, for whatever reason, I operate under the assumption that if I take a deck chair immediately next to someone (even if it's the only one left available at a crowded pool) they will immediately assume that I am a perverted lanky person who is out to rape them. This is not a rational thought. I have not polled people on this issue. Nevertheless, it is the basic assumption under which most of my pool etiquette operates when I'm just a lone guy at the pool. Everything I do has to be very kosher and all of my behavior has to be very purposefully antithetical to any kind of behavior that a casual, lanky rapist might conceivably exhibit.

Also, if I sat directly next to someone, they might talk to me, and that would freak me out. Plus, if I had already taken my shirt off, I would be uncomfortable replying to them - BECAUSE THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT A RAPIST WOULD DO!

There's been a weird phenomenon at the pool at the off-peak times at which I frequent it. I've gone 3-4 times, and every single time there has been exactly ONE 20-something woman sunbathing and ONE parent/babysitter with 1-2 children. And these categories have never been filled by the same people twice. So there's always one similarly aged woman that I need to make sure doesn't think i'm a rapist, and one person who is slowly but gradually worn down by the task of watching kids at a pool. It's a surreal kind of deja-vu every time I go.

The last time I went to the pool, I was planning on making a whole afternoon of it. I hadn't gotten a lot of sleep the night before, and it seemed like a really good idea to just fall asleep poolside. That way I'd get a nice nap, and maybe I'd be able to take my shirt off and not have people wonder if I had spent the summer in Reykjavik. So I got myself all covered up with sunscreen to keep myself safe. I made extra-sure to remember to get my feet. I always forget my feet. When you're 6'4'' and not very flexible, it takes a lot of effort to rub something on your feet. You have to really want it.

Nonetheless, I didn't put any sunscreen on my face. For whatever reason, it always seems like my face is the hardest thing to get tanned. And I really like getting sun on my face on account of the fact that it makes me look more appealing to myself. And someday I hope to be wrinkled.

Anyway, I was all onboard with the no-sunscreen-face plan until I got out there, and, as the expression goes, the sun hit the face. It was then that I realized some important things.

1. I like my face.
2. If I had to choose the part of my body I would least like to be burned by the sun, it would probably be my face.
3. If I had to choose the part of my body I would least like to be inflicted with skin cancer, it would probably be my face.

So this left me in kind of a pool pickle, because I had already made the strenuous 50 yard walk to the pool and had stupidly left my sunscreen back in my apartment. So, it was going to take a lot of effort to go back and get that. And, as I mentioned, I had already reached all the way down to my feet just minutes earlier. So I was pretty exhausted. Plus, why would I leave the pool merely minutes after arriving? What would other people think? That I had forgotten my special rapist hat?

I ended up spending an uncomfortable couple of hours wherein I would alternately cover my face to make sure that I wasn't getting my face burned off, but also not cover my face for too long so as not to suggest that I was trying to avoid being recognized as a known rapist.

In conclusion, I am not a rapist and it is very important to me that you realize that. I am, however, a ridiculous person.

Defining the Relationship

2006-07-15T19:51:00.000-04:00

Since I've started to enjoy this stupid thing, and I know of two other people who do as well, I figured I'd take a little time to clarify this blog's purpose.

I titled it Jellytown, mostly because that's a silly name that makes me laugh. Also, I have a lot of friends in New York City with whom a blog like this forms what is unfortunately one of the few means of regular interaction (albeit interaction that is really silly). My defining characteristic from the years I spent in NYC with those friends was my propensity to consume significant amounts of jelly, straight from the jar. Thus, it seemed that Jellytown was an appropriate name for my little internet locale.

What I want to do with this blog is to entertain. It's going to be a lot like my old T.J. Monkey's thoughts (see the link to the right), although a little bit more freely structured. I plan on "shooting from the hip" a little bit more than I did with a lot of that writing, especially the later thoughts. So, as we've seen, it's gonna be a lot of my dumb thoughts about what I would do if I was in a band, or my adventures with mold.

It's not gonna be very biographical. I'm looking at this more as "writing exercise" than "online therapy". If I'm in a bad mood, I will not be taking the train to Jellytown. (Although I may drown my sorrows in a nice jar of Smuckers Strawberry Preserves, which, I suppose, could very appropriately be euphemistically referred to as "taking the train to jelly town.") This isn't to say that I don't enjoy your blog that deals mostly about how you've started taking up Brazilian Jujitsu. In that particular instance, I really do enjoy your blog. It's great and fascinating. But that's not this blog.

I have lots of artistic friends who seem to write very deep but very vague things in their blogs. Things like "today I realized that the most important thing you could ever say is "can I get a refill?" I don't doubt my ability to be vague, but I'm not very deep. So, if you don't understand something, please tell me. It means that I screwed up. Again, this is not to say that I don't like those vague and alluringinly deep blogs. But that's not this blog.

Finally, with the advance of youtube and other sites, there are a lot of blogs that do a lot of linking to other interesting stuff on the internet. Also, good bloggers will go the effort of turning words into hyperlinks like this. I probably won't. The reason for that is that I'm lazy, but more specifically, I'm lazy in different ways than a lot of other people. I honestly just don't want to go to the effort of doing the really simple work of linking to other things. I consider it to be over and above the call of duty when I do things like italicize (see the last sentence. I think it really added a necessary punch). But on the other hand, it's also kinda lazy to use your blog simply as a means of pointing to other interesting stuff. I'm more than willing to go through the work to create fully original entries with every post. (Truly creative entries like this one, where I talk about my blog on my blog. It's almost dangerously creative. I hope my aforementioned artistic friends are reading this...) So, this blog is just basically gonna be a lot of writing. Is that more interesting than Spider Solitaire? I leave that to you. Again, to those of you good citizens who work to promote the latest viral video or flash game involving peeing, I'm not trying to condemn your work. I enjoy those blogs a lot. But that's not this blog.

Finally, a lot of blogs are just sad attempts by people who think they are funny to pathetically wring out a little more of their friends' attention, mostly by taking advantage of the desperate boredom that many of them face at their jobs. Well, that is this blog.

Makin' It Classy

2006-07-14T20:25:00.000-04:00

I finally got around to cleaning up some of the default blogger settings on this page. For those of you who may have been confused, it was never my intention to provide everyone friendly links to a help page that tells you how to edit the links on your blogspot page.

It should be noted that I put A LOT of thought into which blogs to which I would link. It's a very definitive list. So, for instance, if we're good friends, and you have a blog, and everything is totally cool with us, and we call each other every week to check in, and we have a regular cribbage game on Tuesdays, and I'm the godfather of your child... well, in truth, I actually hate you because clearly I didn't link to your blog.

I'm new at this, so I'm not familar with the nuances of blog etiquette. I tried to make sure to include everyone that has already linked to me. I don't want to be the guy with the jelly store, and the guy from peanutbutter emporium sends a gift package of peanut butter, and then I don't return the favor. Because we all know that guy.

And I also included a sexy little pic, cropped out of an old family Christmas Card. Now the page looks classy, and probably exactly the same as 10 million other dumb blogs.

Please Submit All Show Proposals to Jesus

2006-07-13T20:30:00.000-04:00

The benefits and disadvantages of having graduated from Divinity School, from a secretarial perspective.

Benefits:
I can type the following words very quickly. They practically roll off the fingers:
Christian
Catholicism
Soteriology
Catechesis
Apostolic
Ecclesiology
Epistemology
Transubstantiation
Clarinet

Disadvantages:
Whenever I type the name "Chris," there's a 75% chance that out of habit I accidentally continue on and type "Christ".

Anyway, that's the reason that the DSI Artistic Committee now consists of myself, Zach, and Christ.

And that is the reason for the upcoming 6 month run of Salvationprov.

Maybe it's just extra-tangy butter...

2006-07-12T15:59:00.000-04:00

I was halfway through the process of making a grilled cheese sandwich when I realized that I was using moldy bread.

This comes about a week after I was sitting in my living room, eating slices of buttered bread and wondering why they tasted tangy - MOLDY BREAD! It was horrible, because I had definitely already eaten a whole slice of it when I came to this realization, and there was another whole mouthful of moldy tanginess that had to be spat out comically at the conclusion of my very slow realization.

So, admittedly, I should have been more alert on the moldy bread lookout. (Don't worry. It wasn't the same loaf of bread. I'm not a complete moron.) But the problem is that this mold is some kind of freaky stealth mold. Maybe it's just my sheltered upbringing, but I'm used to my mold being blue-green, and growing up and out of the bread, and generally making itself known to the world. But this mold is bread-colored and it operates within the very fabric of the bread itself. It's camo-mold. And it succeeded in its mission to get me to eat what I thought was inexplicably tangy bread and/or butter. And then it presumably died an ignoble death in the acidic depths of my tummy.

What troubles me is that camo/ninja/stealth-mold doesn't really make sense to me on an evolutionary level:
Nobody wants to eat mold, so it seems like it would be to the mold's advantage to come out and be very open about itself. "We're here. We're mold. Get used to it. And please when you dispose of us, place us somewhere moist."

So, I'm not sure what the mold is up to. But if you eat some bread that is tangy, by all means, take the time to ponder and investigate what it is that is making the bread taste tangy. But do NOT continue to eat the tangy, funky bread while you work through that process. I learned that extremely obvious lesson the hard way.

My First Correction

2006-07-12T02:33:00.000-04:00

Well, I'm only a handful of posts in and already I've screwed something up. But it's OK, because I learned something that I never knew and I've also been inspired to contemplate the nature of communication in general. It relates to my post concerning how Hardee's commercials make me nauseous.

While away from my apartment, my friend Flynn left me a series of IM messages, which I will distill now into one readable paragraph:

Bret! I am reading your blog and I wanted to point out a common error that you should correct because I respect and like you and don't want others to think you made this error. When you feel the need to vomit, you are nauseated, not nauseous. "Nauseous" is the property of making one nauseated. And you, my friend, make no one want to chum the room in which they are residing. So people making eating noises is, in itself, nauseous, and makes you nauseated. Thank you and goodnight.

First of all, Flynn is clearly very smart. I'm happy to make that known to more people via this blog. So kudos to him, and many thanks for the kind way in which he went about his correction.

Second, I absolutely never knew this! That's kind of amazing, because I am also really smart. And for the most part I generally do a good job at understanding the language in which I speak. But I looked it up, and Flynn's definitions were correct.

However, the misuse of these words is so prevalent, that even the dictionary included a "Usage Note" referencing the fact that the vast majority of people use nauseous to mean nauseated, and nauseating to mean nauseous. That creates an interesting conundrum for a writer wishing to express his nauseated condition. If my goal is to communicate myself to the reader, should I be more concerned with the correct usage of a word, or the way in which that word will be received by the reader. The fact that dictionaries include a secondary definition of "nauseating" for nauseous is a testament to the way in which popular usage can alter the meaning of a word.

So what to do? Stand up for the word's intended meaning, or ride the wave of popular expression?

Well, I know what I'm gonna do. I'm gonna correct people's misusage of "nauseous" at every juncture I can. Because I like feeling smart. And I'm kind of a jackass.

Perseverance

2006-07-11T13:46:00.000-04:00

About a week ago, I tried to twist off the top to a 16oz Mt. Dew and I failed completely. I was totally thwarted. I tried wrapping my shirt around it and twisting, drying off my hands, I even knocked the plastic bottle against various surfaces in an effort to loosen it somewhat.

Every day since then, I've pulled it out of the fridge for a couple minutes to see if it was ready to yield its delicious treasure. But there was no such luck. I was legitimately worried that there was some kind of factory error and opening it wouldn't have even been a possibility. In case of such an event I was thinking of ways in which I could try to pierce the bottle and drain it into some kind of waiting receptacle.

Today I finally brought some pliers into the mix and... Success!

After my first swig I looked sincerely at the bottle and said aloud, "I was NEVER going to give up on you."

This is my life.

The first thing I heard when I turned the TV on today:

2006-07-05T15:08:00.000-04:00

"Paintball... is like chess with guns."

Boo on Hardee's

2006-07-04T15:02:00.000-04:00

As much as I enjoy good television advertising (anybody still remember the Bud Ice penguin?), I still hold to the idea that an advertising campaign is more likely to keep me from ever buying something than to convince me to buy something I wouldn't have otherwise wanted. Case in point: my brother still won't buy (or receive as a gift) Duracell batteries on account of their advertising campaign several years ago that featured strange "people as toys" which my brother dubbed "Plastic People."

Anyways, I am forever abstaining from eating at Hardee's on account of their horrible advertising campaign of the last couple of years. My official stance is that I'm protesting their horrible misogynistic and ridiculous conception of masculinity and what is required of someone who would want to eat a large, well-made burger.

But my even bigger problem with the commercials is that they often include a lot of sounds of people eating. And it grosses me out. There's a couple which feature the idea of licking the extra cheese off the wrapper, and seriously I have to change the channel before I become nauseous. It's like when you're flipping through, and you land on the Health channel and you see a quick image of someone's open torso and their spleen separated from their body. Except for that doesn't make me want to boycott necessary surgery.

On the other hand, I really love the Sonic commercials because they're very funny and feature improvisors with whom I am familiar. I intentionally tried to go to a Sonic one time when I was at a wedding, but I got scared off by their drive-in style system. Oh well.

I'm the mayor of Jellytown

2006-07-03T15:01:00.000-04:00

I thought of this while I was with my girlfriend, so she gets muse points for this.

Many of my friends in college were nice dudes who didn't get a lot of ladies. In some ways, this was the separating mark between my all-dudes a cappella group and the other one on campus. We made better music and were nicer and very polite. The other dudes were kind of fratty jackasses who were the kind of people that made ladies want to get drunk and make out with them.

As such, my fellow compatriots would often describe how they felt themselves to be stuck in the "Friend Zone." Because, really, we weren't that much better than the fratty jackasses. We still wanted to spend most of our time making out with girls that we hung around and found attractive. It was just that our own courteousness and respect for others got in the way a lot of the time. As such, we usually ended up just being the trusted friends of these girls with whom we really wanted to make out. Thus, we resided in the "Friend Zone". In the very common worst-case-scenario, we would end up being the person to whom the female complained when she grew frustrated with her own tendency to hook up with only fratty assholes. There was a lot of sexual frustration in the Friend Zone.

Anyway, I had one particular friend (and now I refer to that term in its normal usage, and not as someone who was stuck in my Friend Zone) who spent a particularly large amount of his time in the Friend Zone. As such, he took to calling himself the Mayor of the Friend Zone, as a way of distinguishing just how much time he lived in this curious state of sexual frustration. And this particular distinction was not limited to the Friend Zone. If you drank a ton of Pepsi, you'd be the mayor of Pepsitown. If you were really into Pokemon, you'd be the mayor of Pokemonville. In that particular case, you would also hopefully be a child.

I realized recently that I accepted this whole idea of Mayorship, yet in no way does it reflect how mayors of particular cities and towns are chosen. The mayor is not the person who most embodies the characteristic of a particular town. He's just some dude (or dudette!) elected to make sure things are going alright for everybody in that town.

For consistency's sake, one of the two following repercussions should take place:

1. Towns should have to elect their mayors based on the defining attribute of that town. So, the mayor of Milwaukee is the dude (or dudette!) who makes the most beer. And the mayor of Chicago would be the dude (or dudette?) with the biggest moustache. Obviously, to make this even better, some towns should change their name to things like BigEarsville or Funtoplayboccewith City.

2. People who claim to be the mayor of things like the Friend Zone should have to make sure that things are running smoothly in the Friend Zone. Like, they should check with other lame dudes and make sure that they're still sexually frustrated and that Liz is still hooking up with guys who treat her like crap.

Anyway, I'm the mayor of Jellytown, because I created it.

(Although I do LOVE jelly!)

Me and my famous band

2006-07-03T14:46:00.000-04:00

For a long time I've wanted to be in a famous band, but for unusual reasons. It's never been so that I could get lots of money or girls or fame. It's for stupid reasons, like the little things that I would want to put in our liner notes, or the respectful way in which I would treat stadium personnel at our shows, or the album that I would release where all of the songs would be about small woodland creatures.

Lately, I've wanted to be in a famous band so that all of our music videos could be shot-for-shot remakes of 80s music videos. The first one would be Journey's "Separate Ways (Worlds Apart)".

Famous bands should either be as fun and clever as me or stop hogging all the famous band action.

2006-06-26T15:49:00.000-04:00

I used to have a secret blog that was very well received. Now, we'll see if I have any desire to write interesting things for people beyond a small circle of my friends.

If I do write things here, I will try to make them interesting and/or funny.